<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Folksonomy: A Big Word for a Common Concept</title>
	<link>http://clear.bluedei.com/2007/10/01/folksonomy-a-big-word-for-a-common-concept/</link>
	<description>All Things Web 2.0 and more</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Clear Blue Dei &#124; Everything You Ever Wanted to Know, About the Word Portmanteau</title>
		<link>http://clear.bluedei.com/2007/10/01/folksonomy-a-big-word-for-a-common-concept/#comment-450</link>
		<author>Clear Blue Dei &#124; Everything You Ever Wanted to Know, About the Word Portmanteau</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://clear.bluedei.com/2007/10/01/folksonomy-a-big-word-for-a-common-concept/#comment-450</guid>
		<description>[...] since I used the word Portmanteau in my post about Folksonomies, I have noticed that a lot of searches have been directed to my blog of people searching how to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] since I used the word Portmanteau in my post about Folksonomies, I have noticed that a lot of searches have been directed to my blog of people searching how to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0, Folksonomy: BS created to exclude or useful definitions?</title>
		<link>http://clear.bluedei.com/2007/10/01/folksonomy-a-big-word-for-a-common-concept/#comment-256</link>
		<author>Web 2.0, Folksonomy: BS created to exclude or useful definitions?</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://clear.bluedei.com/2007/10/01/folksonomy-a-big-word-for-a-common-concept/#comment-256</guid>
		<description>[...] is an interesting blog post I&#8217;ve been reading about the regular recourse to using needlessly scientific buzz-words and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] is an interesting blog post I&#8217;ve been reading about the regular recourse to using needlessly scientific buzz-words and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Newman</title>
		<link>http://clear.bluedei.com/2007/10/01/folksonomy-a-big-word-for-a-common-concept/#comment-248</link>
		<author>Aaron Newman</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://clear.bluedei.com/2007/10/01/folksonomy-a-big-word-for-a-common-concept/#comment-248</guid>
		<description>yes, taxonomy and folksonomy seem to be terms used to confuse people. Simple terms - big words. Meme still gets me - I kind of understand, but it's still not clear. Now I have to go look up "McLuhanesque". I havent heard of that one yet! And I have to figure out how to pronounce "Portmanteau".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, taxonomy and folksonomy seem to be terms used to confuse people. Simple terms - big words. Meme still gets me - I kind of understand, but it&#8217;s still not clear. Now I have to go look up &#8220;McLuhanesque&#8221;. I havent heard of that one yet! And I have to figure out how to pronounce &#8220;Portmanteau&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
