Well, that’s interesting – what did it mean? Then I read the comments below it and Jason had commented the following:

“Rules of the game: grab the book nearest you. Right now.
* Turn to page 56.
* Find the fifth sentence.
* Post that sentence AS YOUR STATUS. AND POST these instructions in a comment to this status….
* Don’t dig for your favorite book, the coolest, the most intellectual. Use the CLOSEST book.”

What a fun, great idea! I grabbed my closest book (it was “Wonderland, the Zen of Alice”), turned to page 56, sentence 5 and wrote as my status: “Go home to your mother”. To be honest, I wanted to cheat and use sentence 6: “The little gangster had simply lost his way” but I was good…

Then I thought “Why not expand this to Twitter?”. It is perfect for Twitter, it would be short and sweet and interesting to read what other people post. And it would be slightly mysterious too

So I’m going to post mine on Twitter with a tag of #Page56 and see what happens. I hope other people do it too!

Go home to your mother,
~Susan Mellott

But now Facebook claims rights to anything you upload, regardless whether or not you have removed the content or your account has been closed. Forever. They can even sub-license it.

This is current wording, which is the same as the old terms. However they removed the section at the end.

“You hereby grant Facebook an irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, fully paid, worldwide license (with the right to sublicense) to (a) use, copy, publish, stream, store, retain, publicly perform or display, transmit, scan, reformat, modify, edit, frame, translate, excerpt, adapt, create derivative works and distribute (through multiple tiers), any User Content you (i) Post on or in connection with the Facebook Service or the promotion thereof subject only to your privacy settings or (ii) enable a user to Post, including by offering a Share Link on your website and (b) to use your name, likeness and image for any purpose, including commercial or advertising, each of (a) and (b) on or in connection with the Facebook Service or the promotion thereof.”

so far nothing has changed (although read this carefully since this is what you have always agreed to).

And this is what has been removed:

“You may remove your User Content from the Site at any time. If you choose to remove your User Content, the license granted above will automatically expire, however you acknowledge that the Company may retain archived copies of your User Content.”

So no longer does their license expire. You can remove it, but once it was uploaded, it becomes theirs, with nothing to say they give up any rights to it.

In addition, the Termination paragraph near the end states:

“The following sections will survive any termination of your use of the Facebook Service: Prohibited Conduct, User Content, Your Privacy Practices, Gift Credits, Ownership; Proprietary Rights, Licenses, Submissions, User Disputes; Complaints, Indemnity, General Disclaimers, Limitation on Liability, Termination and Changes to the Facebook Service, Arbitration, Governing Law; Venue and Jurisdiction and Other.”

Here is Facebook’s new Terms of Service (as of Feb 4, 2009).

So don’t upload ANYTHING to Facebook that you don’t want to give away all rights to Facebook, permanently. So those pictures of you partying could come back to haunt you years in the future and there is nothing you can do about it. And if you upload any original material like pictures, drawings, songs, etc., you gave facebook rights to them permanently. I’m not sure exactly what that means legally, but I know that artists and musicians should be very, very careful. Does this mean facebook could use your original music for its advertising? I think so.

So you become famous and facebook could capitalize on it. Embarrasing pictures? Early artwork or music? I don’t even want to think about it.

Thanks to the Consumerist.com website for this information. I subscribe to their rss feed and frequently read their articles which are always interesting and informative. And you should also read their article called “Facebook’s New Terms Of Service: “We Can Do Anything We Want With Your Content. Forever.”

Enjoy but take care,
Susan Mellott

With the many popups that come up when on the web and knowing that it is not a good idea to click on a popup that you do not recognize, I’m sure many people ignored the popup and had no idea that Facebook was gathering information about their purchases and sharing it with their Facebook friends.

This caused some Facebook users to find out what they were getting as gifts for the holidays and others to have items such as their movie purchases distributed to all their friends without their knowledge. I’m sure that there are people on Facebook who would prefer that the movies they buy are not shared with everyone who knows them on Facebook!

Facebook users rose up in protest and Facebook announced that it would change its policy to one of ‘opt-in’ instead of ‘opt-out’. In other words, you would have to specifically agree to share your purchase information as opposed to specifically saying you do not want it shared.

Here is some information from MSNBC in a post called “Facebook does an About-Face on Privacy Policy” on the purchase gathering and distributing that Facebook implemented about 3 weeks ago:

40 commerce Web sites using Beacon
More than 40 different Web sites, including Fandango.com, Overstock.com and Blockbuster.com, had embedded Beacon in their pages to track transactions made by Facebook users.

Unless instructed otherwise, the participating sites alerted Facebook, which then notified a user’s friends within the social network about items that had been bought or products that had been reviewed.

Facebook thought the marketing feeds would help its users keep their friends better informed about their interests while also serving as “trusted referrals” that would help drive more sales to the sites using the Beacon system.

But thousands of Facebook users viewed the Beacon referrals as a betrayal of trust. Critics blasted the advertising tool as an unwelcome nuisance with flimsy privacy protections that had already exasperated and embarrassed some users.

Some users have already complained about inadvertently finding out about gifts bought for them for Christmas and Hanukkah after Beacon shared information from Overstock.com. Other users say they were unnerved when they discovered their friends had found out what movies they were watching through purchases made on Fandango.

And an apology was offered:

“We’re sorry if we spoiled some of your holiday gift-giving plans,” Facebook’s Paul Janzer wrote in a posting addressed to Beacon’s critics. “We are really trying to provide you with new meaningful ways, like Beacon, to help you connect and share information with your friends.” Janzer also acknowledged Beacon “can be kind of confusing.”

I think that “kind of confusing” is Facebook-Speak for “deliberately misleading”.

This is not the first time Facebook has had users rise up over privacy changes. Last year, Facebook rolled out a “news feeds” tool that tracked changes to users’ profiles. After thousands of users rebelled, Zuckerberg issued a contrite apology and added a way to turn off the news feeds.

I saw that on my (and other friends) Facebook and thought that it was a bit iffy. And actually, I still have it on mine and so does most of the people I know. Even though Facebook offered a way to turn it off, that doesn’t mean that they made it easy or clear. I really didn’t even know it could be turned off until I read the article from MSNBC and I still don’t know how.

And there was the whole debacle about Facebook making people’s profiles available to search engines. I went through the process to do what they said so my profile was not shared, but it was extremely complicated and I really don’t know exactly what I ended up with.

I am so totally against the whole ‘opt-out’ style that Facebook is going with, especially since it is doing some really devious things without people’s knowledge. Yes, there are changes all the time to various social networking sites in order to improve their services. But I really don’t see how Facebook can stand there and say that these fall under that category. Either they don’t care, or they think their users are too stupid to know what they are doing, or both.

These are things I don’t think Facebook should be doing in the first place. But at the least, they should be something that Facebook users can choose to implement only if they want to, and can easily turn it off if they decide against it. Still, I think it is shady to even have it as a part of Facebook.

Facebook has come a long way from when it started and it was a safe and secure site for students to congregate. And while it is nice that it has opened up some, I really don’t see it as being much different from MySpace anymore and in some cases, even less reliable as far as privacy and respect for its users are concerned.

While almost all of the Web 2.0 social networking sites have been pretty decent and relatively trustworthy in my opinion, I am having serious doubts about Facebook. And I think Facebook users should too. It is not what it once was and I’m not sure that Facebook users realize that.

UPDATE: Here is a link to another interesting article called “Takesies Backsies: Facebook Flouts User Privacy… Again“.

~Susan Mellott

What?!?

Here is the Facebook blog entry explaining it. I wonder if it says it on everyone’s profile page, because I went to the facebook homepage and saw it. Most people would not do that.

And per the Reuters article titled “Facebook lets users choose to publicize themselves“:

“Starting later today, Facebook will begin notifying members they have a choice over whether to keep their listings private or to allow Facebook to make their name and profile picture available when outsiders search the site.Unlike most sites on the Web, Facebook has previously denied access by search services to information on the site. But after notifying users over the next 30 days of its plans to open up basic profile listings of its members, Facebook plans to begin allowing sites like Google (GOOG.O), Yahoo (YHOO.O) or others to “crawl,” or index, its public member profiles.

Early next month, non-members of Facebook will be able to type the names of friends or acquaintances into a search box on Facebook’s home page at http://www.facebook.com to see if they have public profiles on Facebook in order to contact them.”

This is an extremely controversial move by Facebook, as it has been extremely careful of its members information and has been seen as a safe and secure alternative to MySpace. MySpace does not control who accesses the member information, thus making parents of children using it concerned about internet predators and members in general wary of who is viewing their data.

Facebook has already created controversy by becoming more open and by starting to promote itself to adults as opposed to its original premise of being created for students. This changes the whole Facebook concept and changes it more into a MySpace type network. Facebook was unique in that it was not an open social network and the students using it felt more secure, both from outside searches and from their parents and teachers.

I have recently joined Facebook and I am surprised at the number of people who use it. I had been under the impression that MySpace was the main one and Facebook was fringe. Especially since I’d looked at it earlier and it just didn’t seem applicable to me since I was not a student, did not belong to a school (network) and since I was not working at IBM any longer, I could not look up co-workers in the IBM network (not that it would have done much good since there are thousands of IBM employees and no way to refine the search that I could see). And the security was tight to the point of paranoia it seemed. In order for me to join the IBM group, I had to have an IBM email address which they would verify before allowing me to join. And this is after they opened it up to work groups as well as school groups.

Now, when I went to Facebook, it says that since I’m set to “everyone”, search engines will access me on Facebook. While I don’t mind search engines finding me in general, the whole point of Facebook has always been its privacy. So I changed my privacy settings and now I’m not sure who can or can’t see me or my information. There are so many options of what people can and can’t see and who can see this profile vs. that profile vs. nothing at all, that I don’t know if the people I want to find me can still find me anymore. But I don’t want ‘everyone’ (including search engines) so I had to choose at most, anyone in my networks and friends. I could also choose the following to access my profile: people in college, high school, company, regional and/or no networks. But what good does that do?

Then there was a selection of things that those people who saw my profile could do, like poke me, message me, add me as a friend, see my picture and view my friend list. It’s getting more and more complicated! Then there is a whole other page where I can get more specific, like which parts of my profile are available to people that I contact or who contact me or who I’ve banned or limited or on and on and on….

Actually, these may always have been there since it was set up to be exceptionally secure. Except now it seems you have a choice of exceptionally secure, or everyone and search engines can view. And you have to jump through hoops to figure out how to set it the way that allows access within Facebook and not without.

I don’t know, it seems like a mistake to me and certainly opens up the playing field to another “Facebook” to come along and take its place, just like it did to MySpace.

I’ll be very interested in seeing if Facebook emails me something explaining the changes. But the main thing right now is for anyone on Facebook who thought their information was private, you better get in there and make sure, because chances are it won’t be.

~Susan Mellott